The Unresolved Issues of the Hmars
Lal Dena
( This
article was published in Indigenous World 1999-2000, Copenhagen, Denmark. pp.303-305)
Mizoram is a
multi-ethnic and pluralistic state comprising as many as 14 tribes with
different languages and dialects. During the British rule, Mizoram was known as
the Lushai Hills District which formed a part of Assam. In 1954, its name was changed
to the Mizo Hill District. After the
secessionist movement under the Mizo National Front(MNF) arose, it was upgraded
to the status of a centrally administered union territory. In 1987, it attained
full statehood.
In
Mizoram, there are two groups of Hmars: those who are completely Mizoised; and
those who are only partially assimilated by Mizo culture. The Hmars in the
first category are satisfied to consider themselves Mizos. They have now
totally forgotten even the Hmar language as well as their cultural ethos and
values. On the other hand, the partially assimilated Hmars, while identifying
themselves as Mizos, are also at the same time fully aware of their distinct
identity, traditions, customs and language. This is more so among those Hmars
living outside Mizoram. Even at higher secondary school level they can offer
Hmar language as one of vernacular papers ( now Hmar language is being
processed for inclusion in the degree course also). It is among this group of
partially assimilated Hmars that the search for a separate identity has gained
momentum.
It
has never been the intention of Hmars living in and outside Mizoram to distance
themselves from the mainstream of Mizo society. When the Mizo Union was formed
in 1946, all Hmars living in different parts of northeast India, particularly
those in Manipur, opted for integration with Mizoram. As a matter of fact, the
Hmars in Manipur boycotted the first Manipur general election of 1948 to join
the `Mizo Sorkar’. This had never materialized because the Union leadership in
Mizoram did not utter even a word to include their brethrens in Manipur in the
Mizo Hills Autonomous District Council. Again, when the MNF started its
independence movement in 1966, the Hmars in and outside Mizoram joined the movement on the promise of a “Greater
Mizoram”, which meant the integration of all areas inhabited by Mizos in northeast India under a single administrative
unit. Keeping this objective in view, the Mizo Integration Council (MIC) was
formed in Manipur at the time of the talks between the MNF leadership and the
Government of India. But when the Mizo Accord was signed on 30th of
June 1986, no mention was made for integrating Hmar’s inhabited areas with
Mizoram. The only redeeming feature of the accord was that the rights and
privileges of the minorities in Mizoram as envisaged in the Constitution of
India should continue to be preserved and protected, and that their social and
economic advancement should be ensured.
Disillusioned
with all these false hopes and promises, the Hmars in Mizoram began political
consultations among themselves, and finally formed the Hmar People`s Convention
(HPC) in 1986. Since then this party spearheaded the demand for creation of an
autonomous self-government covering north and northeast Mizoram. Because of the
state government’s inept handling of the situation, the HPC had, from April
1987, been compelled to wage an armed struggle for autonomy. The movement had
gained momentum when it set up clandestine links with Naga militants to co-ordinate
guerrilla raids. This armed confrontation continued till the HPC representatives
and the government of Mizoram mutually agreed to ministerial level talks in
1992. After having nine rounds of talks, the memorandum of settlement was signed
at Aizawl, the capital of Mizoram on the 27th of July 1994. Some of the salient
points of the agreement are as given below:
1. On
the question of the restoration of normalcy, the HPC agreed to undertake every
necessary step to end underground activities within the agreed time frame. All
underground personnel of the HPC should undertake to return to civic life by
giving up their arms as a way of abjuring violence and helping to restore
normalcy.
2. The
HPC was to take all necessary steps to amend its articles of association/ constitution,
so as to make them conform to the provisions of law.
3. The
HPC agreed to undertake not to extend any support to the NSCN, the ULFA or any
other such underground groups by supplying arms or providing protection or
helping them in any other way.
4. For
its part, the government of Mizoram agreed to take steps towards the relief and
rehabilitation of all HPC underground personnel who gave up the struggle. They
also agreed to make an ex-gratia payment to the next of kin, heirs and
dependants of HPC members killed during the period of the struggle.
5. With
a view to satisfying the desires and aspirations of the Hmar community in
Mizoram, the state government agreed to initiate measures to introduce Hmar
language as a medium of instruction up to primary level. They also agreed to recognize
Hmar language as one of the major languages of the state of Mizoram.
6. The
government of Mizoram also agreed to take steps to help promote and preserve
Hmar culture.
7. To
further the social, economic, cultural and educational development of the
people in the north and northeastern parts of Mizoram, the government of
Mizoram agreed to set up Sinlung Hills
Development Council that would cover an area to be specified and agreed upon by
it and the HPC, by notification in the official gazette. A separate fund would
be earmarked for schemes to be implemented in the area covered by the Council.
8. Regarding
political safeguard as available under the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution
of India, the government of Mizoram would take immediate measures to include in
the Schedule(Tribal) Area of the Sixth Schedule an area to be specified which
includes both areas demanded by the HPC, and other non-scheduled areas of
Mizoram.
Soon
after signing the agreement, the state government and the HPC had got bogged
down in procedural wrangles over such matters as the demarcation of the
so-called Council’s boundary. As a result of both internal divisions within the
HPC’s leadership and the government’s apathy, basic issues relating to the
right of self-determination and autonomy have so far not been addressed to.
Even if the state assembly recommends scheduling the areas which the HPC has
been demanding under the Sixth Schedule, the Central Government would not be in
a position to rush the bill through a divided parliament. Dissatisfied with the
implementation process of the agreement, the HPC (Democracy) has parted ways with
the overground HPC leadership and has now been spearheading the underground movement for the creation of
Hmar homeland in Mizoram. In the past
the short-sighted state administration had used excessive force as a
counter-measure, a strategy which only worsened the situation and led the HPC
to increase their political demands to nothing less than demanding statehood.
What is now required is not another series of counter-offensives, but the speedy
resolution of all pending basic issues. The present government is well placed
to do this because of its past experience as guerrilla fighters. The sooner the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment